New York Times

Clinton knocks Pompeo for vowing to release more of her emails

“It makes me literally sick to my stomach to think that we'd have four more years of this abuse and destruction of our institutions, and damaging of our norms and our values, and lessening of our leadership"


Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton dismissed her successor Mike Pompeo’s pledge to release more of her emails ahead of the election as “pathetic,” insisting that there is nothing of importance in her unreleased communications.

In an interview with The New York Times’ Kara Swisher, the former Democratic presidential nominee downplayed the new push, which came as President Donald Trump has continued to invoke his onetime rival in the final weeks of the 2020 campaign.

Despite Clinton’s name not appearing on the ballot this year, Trump has demanded that his Justice Department continue investigating her and expressed disappointment that Pompeo’s State Department has not released more emails from the private server she infamously used while leading the department.

An FBI investigation into Clinton’s email use resulted in no charges and an internal State Department investigation found last year that there was no widespread effort by her aides or other staffers to mishandle classified information.

But a day after Trump's criticism, Pompeo said in an interview on Fox News that he was working to release information regarding the emails and did not decline to tie at least some aspect of his pledge to the electoral calendar, saying “we’re doing it as fast as we can” while predicting “there will be more to see before the election.”

Asked how she reacted to Pompeo’s promise, Clinton responded, “I thought pathetic. It’s pathetic.”

Clinton contended to Swisher that there would be “nothing” incriminating in any newly released emails, which would be in addition to thousands from her time as secretary that are already online. But “that’s the point,” she claimed.

“What they do is they take these emails that were, frankly, pretty boring if you want to really know the truth about them, and they begin to try to manipulate them, or they pull them out of context, or they make up whole cloth crazy stories about them. And people, unfortunately, believe they’re getting kind of a behind the scenes look,” she said.

Beyond expressing disgust for being targeted by Trump and his allies once again, Clinton spoke in visceral terms of how she felt about the president’s potential reelection.

While denying that she fears being targeted by Trump’s Justice Department in a second term, the former secretary asserted that “I can't entertain the idea of him winning.”

“It makes me literally sick to my stomach to think that we'd have four more years of this abuse and destruction of our institutions, and damaging of our norms and our values, and lessening of our leadership, and the list goes on,” she said, a more colorful expression of her disdain for the president than she has previously given.

Clinton suggested that part of Trump’s decision to continue invoking her name at campaign rallies stemmed from insecurity about his election the first time around, which came under the shadow of Russian interference efforts on Trump’s behalf and with Clinton winning the popular vote by nearly three million.

“I think that Trump and a lot of the people around him know that his victory was not on the up and up,” she argued, pointing to Russia’s disinformation campaign to sow chaos and suppress votes.

“So there is an air of illegitimacy that surrounds Trump’s presidency, and that just infuriates them. It makes them crazy. And that’s a big piece of it.”

“This election is still front and center in people’s psyches. And people fight about it every day online, because there is a deep sense of unfairness and just dismissiveness toward his victory, and he knows it,” she added later, “so part of what he’s doing by attacking me is trying to shore up himself.”

Clinton guessed that sexism and a broader dislike of the Clinton family played into antagonism toward her candidacy as well, themes she has discussed often.

Clinton also predicted a rough road ahead for Trump should he lose next week, pointing to a hundreds of millions of dollars of debt set to come due in a matter of years, according to a Times investigation of Trump’s taxes.

“When he no longer is president, where's he going to get the funding to pay that back?” Clinton asked. “I mean are the billionaires who've been funding him to cause havoc in our country and lower their taxes, are they going to step up and help him? I wouldn't be sure of that if I were him.”

Read more

DeSantis gives Fox 'exclusive' of him signing election bill

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, continuing his ongoing feud with most of the “corporate media,” on Thursday signed into law a contentious election bill during an event where only Fox News was allowed to observe.

Money problems: Rudy Giuliani cuts down his entourage

Rudy Giuliani, the former personal lawyer for ex-president Donald Trump, has reduced the size of his personal entourage. Giuliani laid off several staffers and independent contractors in the last few weeks, according to one of the people, who said the ousted employees had been told that the former New York mayor was seeking to cut costs.

Donald Trump’s Navy Chief blew $2M on eight-month traveling spree

Former Navy Secretary Kenneth Braithwaite traversed the globe in his brief tenure under the Trump administration, spending about $2.4 million in air travel, according to figures and documents obtained by USA TODAY. Braithwaite spent $232,000 the week before President Joe Biden's inauguration to fly to Wake Island, a tiny Pacific atoll, where, according to Navy spokesman Capt. Jereal Dorsey, no sailors or Marines are stationed.

Judge's decision on Bill Barr memo puts spotlight on secretive DOJ office

A small but powerful section of the Department of Justice (DOJ) is under renewed scrutiny after a federal judge tore into former Attorney General William Barr and ordered the DOJ to release a memo that let former President Trump claim he was exonerated by the Mueller probe. Critics of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), which provides legal advice to the White House and Cabinet agencies, have long argued it acts as a rubber stamp for the president and essentially drafts laws behind closed doors.